I briefly interrupt coverage of my Music Visualisation Project to cover a brief rant about the topical "AI" issues that are all the rage right now.
My current position on all this "AI" hype is:
1) TBH, I bloody HATE all this "me too" bandwagon jumping crap that's going around at the moment, and hope it all blows over sooner rather than later - just like "Crypto" and "NFT's" and "Metaverse" fads before it did. The sooner the better!
See also this "supremely on the point" blog post ;) - https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/i-will-fucking-piledrive-you-if-you-mention-ai-again/
2) The UX of all these "AI" tools is fundamentally flawed: i.e.
"I do NOT want to have to fucking 'talk' to your bloody 'chatbot' to do stuff!"
3) The majority of all this "AI" hype is all being poured into all the wrong directions:
"We should be focussing our efforts on helping people do what they cannot do otherwise (i.e. augmenting human abilities), NOT trying to replace them (i.e. destructive misery causing)"
That there is perhaps the best way to sum up the ethical line / standard I use to decide what I spend time working on. I'm only interested in working on stuff that betters humanity's ability to do stuff they otherwise wouldn't be able to do without the technology. Other stuff (e.g. ad networks, DRM, fintech, killer robots, facial recognition, tracking + surveillance tech, making people/industries/etc. "redundant", etc.) I refuse to work on (and really, anything I am not interested in, I do a categorically *awful* job at...)
4) In that light, will I work on or play with AI stuff at some point?
Short Answer: If AI is the right tool for the job, I will consider it.
Operative word: "right tool"
So far, none of the problems I have been working on have required reaching into that toolset, so I haven't bothered to really delve too deeply into it. But if the opportunity arises where AI presents a better solution than we can achieve otherwise, I will consider it then.
Prime Example: With some of the image generation + editing tech out there now, we finally have the a set of powerful tools for fixing a whole bunch of previously prohibitively difficult-to-fix problems, giving us the ability to do spot fixes for defects that would've previously ruined many images / videos. In that sense, these user-guided "repair" tools are precisely the "powerful magic fix-it tools" that we've all dreamed of having all these years, and so, by my previously stated principles, they may well be the right tool for the job in those cases. But using these tools to construct entire fabrications from scratch, trained off everyone's data (however ill-gotten)? Nope - that's pretty much something that should not be done!